EIGRP vs. OSPF — What's the Difference?
By Tayyaba Rehman — Published on January 7, 2024
EIGRP is a Cisco-proprietary, distance-vector routing protocol; OSPF is an open-standard, link-state routing protocol.
Difference Between EIGRP and OSPF
Table of Contents
ADVERTISEMENT
Key Differences
Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) is a proprietary routing protocol developed by Cisco. It's known for its efficiency and scalability in large networks. EIGRP uses a complex algorithm that includes features of both distance vector and link state protocols. On the other hand, Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is an open standard routing protocol that is widely used in large enterprise networks. It's a link-state protocol that provides robust and efficient routing by constructing a complete topology map of the network.
EIGRP offers quick convergence times and minimal bandwidth usage, making it suitable for a variety of network topologies. It uses a unique metric based on bandwidth and delay, allowing for more precise route selection. Conversely, OSPF calculates the shortest path using Dijkstra's algorithm and considers the cost of each path. OSPF's ability to create areas and hierarchies offers efficient network organization and reduced routing table size.
EIGRP supports multiple network protocols, such as IPv4 and IPv6, without requiring separate configurations. This flexibility is a significant advantage in diverse network environments. In contrast, OSPF requires more comprehensive configuration, especially in large and complex networks, but offers the advantage of being supported by a wide range of hardware vendors due to its open-standard nature.
Load balancing is another area where EIGRP and OSPF differ. EIGRP can perform unequal cost load balancing, providing more flexibility in routing traffic. OSPF, however, only supports equal-cost load balancing. This limitation may affect network performance in certain scenarios.
In terms of deployment, EIGRP is often favored in networks predominantly using Cisco equipment due to its proprietary nature. OSPF, being an open standard, is preferred in multi-vendor environments. Each protocol offers unique features and benefits, making the choice between EIGRP and OSPF dependent on specific network requirements and equipment.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comparison Chart
Type
Proprietary (Cisco)
Open standard
Routing Algorithm
Distance-vector & link-state features
Pure link-state
Convergence Speed
Fast
Slower compared to EIGRP
Metric
Bandwidth, delay
Cost based on link speed
Load Balancing
Supports unequal cost load balancing
Supports only equal-cost load balancing
Multivendor Support
Limited (Cisco-centric)
High (due to open standard)
Scalability
Highly scalable
Scalable with proper design
Protocol Support
Supports IPv4 and IPv6 natively
Separate configurations for IPv4/IPv6
Network Organization
Flat or hierarchical
Hierarchical with areas
Configuration Complexity
Generally simpler
Can be complex in large networks
Compare with Definitions
EIGRP
EIGRP supports advanced features like load balancing.
Using EIGRP, the network traffic was evenly distributed across multiple paths.
OSPF
OSPF efficiently manages large network topologies.
The company's extensive network was easily managed using OSPF.
EIGRP
EIGRP allows rapid route convergence.
After a network failure, EIGRP quickly recalculated the best paths.
OSPF
OSPF uses Dijkstra's algorithm for shortest path routing.
OSPF quickly identified the shortest route using Dijkstra's algorithm.
EIGRP
EIGRP uses a composite metric for route selection.
EIGRP selected the optimal route based on bandwidth and delay metrics.
OSPF
OSPF offers robust and dynamic routing capabilities.
OSPF dynamically adjusted routes in response to network changes.
EIGRP
EIGRP is a Cisco-specific routing protocol.
The network was optimized by implementing EIGRP for efficient route calculation.
OSPF
OSPF is an open standard link-state routing protocol.
OSPF was chosen for its compatibility across different network devices.
EIGRP
EIGRP is ideal for large-scale enterprise networks.
Our enterprise network's routing efficiency improved after deploying EIGRP.
OSPF
OSPF supports hierarchical network structures.
Network segmentation was achieved using OSPF's area functionality.
Common Curiosities
Which protocol is better for a Cisco-dominated network?
EIGRP is generally preferred in Cisco-centric networks due to its proprietary nature and integration with Cisco hardware.
What is EIGRP?
EIGRP is a Cisco-proprietary advanced routing protocol offering quick convergence and flexible route calculation.
How does EIGRP differ from OSPF in terms of algorithm?
EIGRP uses a combination of distance-vector and link-state features, while OSPF purely employs a link-state algorithm.
Do EIGRP and OSPF support IPv6?
Yes, both protocols support IPv6, though EIGRP does so natively without needing separate configurations.
What are the advantages of OSPF's area concept?
OSPF's area concept allows for hierarchical network design, reducing routing table size and improving efficiency.
Is EIGRP or OSPF more bandwidth-efficient?
EIGRP is generally more bandwidth-efficient due to its method of sending partial routing updates.
What is OSPF?
OSPF is an open-standard link-state routing protocol, widely used for its efficient management of large network topologies.
Can EIGRP and OSPF coexist in the same network?
Yes, EIGRP and OSPF can coexist through proper network design and routing protocol redistribution.
Which protocol is easier to configure?
EIGRP is generally seen as simpler to configure than OSPF, especially in complex network topologies.
Is OSPF suitable for multi-vendor environments?
Yes, OSPF's open-standard nature makes it suitable for networks with equipment from multiple vendors.
How do EIGRP and OSPF handle load balancing?
EIGRP supports both equal and unequal cost load balancing, while OSPF only supports equal-cost load balancing.
Are there any scalability differences between EIGRP and OSPF?
Both are scalable, but EIGRP is often considered more efficient in large-scale deployments due to its faster convergence.
How do EIGRP and OSPF handle network changes?
EIGRP quickly converges upon network changes, while OSPF recalculates routes using Dijkstra's algorithm.
Which protocol offers faster convergence after a network failure?
EIGRP typically offers faster convergence compared to OSPF following a network failure.
Can OSPF perform unequal cost load balancing?
No, OSPF is limited to equal-cost load balancing.
Share Your Discovery
Previous Comparison
Gryffindor vs. Hufflepuff
Next Comparison
Specific Heat vs. Heat CapacityAuthor Spotlight
Written by
Tayyaba RehmanTayyaba Rehman is a distinguished writer, currently serving as a primary contributor to askdifference.com. As a researcher in semantics and etymology, Tayyaba's passion for the complexity of languages and their distinctions has found a perfect home on the platform. Tayyaba delves into the intricacies of language, distinguishing between commonly confused words and phrases, thereby providing clarity for readers worldwide.
