Tuna vs. Kingfish — What's the Difference?

Tuna is a term encompassing several species of oceanic fish, mainly from the Thunnini tribe. They are large fish, some of which can reach considerable sizes, like the bluefin tuna. Kingfish, on the other hand, doesn't refer to a single specific fish but rather multiple species. In the US, it often pertains to species of mackerel, but in other regions, it might denote different fish.

Both tuna and kingfish have significant roles in global cuisine. Tuna is celebrated for its meaty texture, often appearing in dishes like sushi, sashimi, and steaks. Kingfish, depending on the exact species, can have a milder or more robust flavor, but is generally praised for its rich and distinct taste, making it a popular choice for grilling and frying.

From a commercial perspective, tuna is arguably more globally recognized. The demand for tuna, particularly species like yellowfin and bluefin, has driven them to be heavily fished, leading to sustainability concerns. Kingfish, with its diverse species reference, doesn't have the same singular global market influence as tuna, but regional demands can be quite strong, especially where certain kingfish species are local favorites.

A notable difference is their habitat and behavior. While many tuna species are pelagic, traversing open oceans and often migrating long distances, kingfish species tend to stay closer to coastlines or specific regions. This distinction impacts not only their behavior but also their roles in local ecosystems.

In recreational angling, both tuna and kingfish are sought-after targets. Tuna are prized for their fighting prowess and the challenge they present to sport fishermen. Kingfish, depending on the species, can also offer a rigorous fight, making them an exciting catch.