Arbitration vs. Adjudication — What's the Difference?

A method of resolving disputes outside the courtroom, involving a neutral third party.

Unsatisfied with the verdict, they decided to appeal the adjudication decision.

Decisions made in arbitration are generally binding and have limited avenues for appeal.

The contract dispute went to adjudication, where it was heard by a judge.

Allows parties to choose their arbitrator(s), often experts in the field relevant to the dispute.

Due to the adjudication, the details of their dispute became publicly accessible.

Often stipulated as the preferred method of dispute resolution in contracts.

The adjudication process was thorough, adhering to strict legal protocols.

Characterized by its confidentiality and speed compared to traditional court cases.

In their adjudication, the judge was assigned, and the legal framework was predetermined.

Arbitration, a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), is a way to resolve disputes outside the judiciary courts. The dispute will be decided by one or more persons (the 'arbitrators', 'arbiters' or 'arbitral tribunal'), which renders the 'arbitration award'.

Adjudication is the legal process by which an arbiter or judge reviews evidence and argumentation, including legal reasoning set forth by opposing parties or litigants, to come to a decision which determines rights and obligations between the parties involved.Adjudication can also refer to the processes at dance competitions, in television game shows and at other competitive forums, by which competitors are evaluated and ranked and a winner is found.

The use of an arbitrator to settle a dispute

To make a decision (in a legal case or proceeding), as where a judge or arbitrator rules on some disputed issue or claim between the parties.

The process by which the parties to a dispute submit their differences to the judgment of an impartial person or group appointed by mutual consent or statutory provision.

To study and settle (a dispute or conflict)

The act or process of arbitrating.

To act as a judge of (a contest or an aspect of a contest).

A process through which two or more parties use an arbitrator or arbiter in order to resolve a dispute.

To make a decision in a legal case or proceeding

In general, a form of justice where both parties designate a person whose ruling they will accept formally. More specifically in Market Anarchist (market anarchy) theory, arbitration designates the process by which two agencies pre-negotiate a set of common rules in anticipation of cases where a customer from each agency is involved in a dispute.

To study and settle a dispute or conflict.

The hearing and determination of a cause between parties in controversy, by a person or persons chosen by the parties.

To act as a judge of a contest.

(law) the hearing and determination of a dispute by an impartial referee agreed to by both parties (often used to settle disputes between labor and management)

The act of adjudicating, of reaching a judgement.

The act of deciding as an arbiter; giving authoritative judgment;

A judgment or sentence.

(legal) The decision upon the question of whether the debtor is a bankrupt.

(emergency response) The process of identifying the type of material or device that set off an alarm and assessing the potential threat with corresponding implications for the need to take further action.

A process by which land is attached as security or in satisfaction of a debt.

The act of adjudicating; the act or process of trying and determining judicially.

A deliberate determination by the judicial power; a judicial decision or sentence.

The decision upon the question whether the debtor is a bankrupt.

A process by which land is attached security or in satisfaction of a debt.

The final judgment in a legal proceeding; the act of pronouncing judgment based on the evidence presented

The legal process of resolving a dispute through the court system, involving a judge or jury.

Arbitration is a private method of dispute resolution involving a neutral third party to make a decision.

Adjudication is the formal process of resolving disputes within the court system, involving a judge or jury.

Yes, adjudication can be more costly and time-consuming due to its formalities and potential for appeals.

Arbitration decisions are generally final with limited opportunities for appeal.

A jury, when involved, decides on the facts of the case in a trial, under the guidance of a judge.

Arbitration is private with confidential outcomes, while adjudication is public, making outcomes part of the public record.

Yes, arbitration decisions are legally binding and enforceable in courts.

For its speed, confidentiality, and the ability to select an arbitrator with specific expertise.

No, arbitration proceedings are private and confidential.

Parties can select arbitrators who have specific expertise relevant to their dispute.

Because it allows for more flexibility in procedures and does not follow the strict rules of court.

No, parties cannot choose their judge in adjudication; judges are assigned based on the legal system.

Its confidentiality, speed, and the control it offers over the selection of arbitrators.

It ensures transparency and allows for legal precedents to be established.